3: ECONOMICS, WORK, PROFESSION, STANDARD OF LIVING
- WHAT IS YOUR ATTITUDE TOWARDS FOREIGN ASSISTANCE IN ELIMINATING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE CHORNOBYL CATASTROPHE
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(humanitarian assistance (food, other items, medicines))
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(have foreign doctors and radiologists work in Ukraine)
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(have foreign experts in the field of atomic energy work in Ukraine)
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(finance projects to shut down the Chornobyl plant and to construct a new cover for the fourth reactor)
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(finance training of Ukrainian experts in the West)
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(finance ecological movements, as well as ways to provide ecological and radiological education for the population)
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(rehabilitation and treatment of those harmed by radiation abroad)
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(other (describe))
- IF THE ASSISTANCE CONTINUES TO BE PROVIDED, WHAT FORM SHOULD IT TAKE FIRST OF ALL? (Select no more than two priority areas)...(difficult to answer)
- IDENTIFY THE NUMBER OF THE MOST IMPORTANT STATEMENT
- IDENTIFY THE NUMBER OF THE MOST IMPORTANT STATEMENT
- DOES YOUR FAMILY RECEIVE ANY KIND OF ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE IN THE FORM OF INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE?
- HOW DO YOU EVALUATE INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE IN OVERCOMING THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE CHORNOBYL CATASTROPHE?
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(The work of international doctors and radiologists in Ukraine)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(The work of international experts in the field of atomic energy)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(Financing projects on safely closing down the Chornobyl Power Plant and a new covering for the fourth reactor)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(Humanitarian assistance (food, other items, medicines))
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(Financing our experts to train in the West)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(Financing ecological movements, radiological and ecological education of the population)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(Rehabilitation and treatment abroad for those who have suffered from radiation)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(Other)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(I am against foreign assistance)
- IN THE CASE THAT THIS ASSISTANCE IS PROVIDED IN THE FUTURE, TO WHAT ENDS SHOULD BE UTILIZED FIRST?...(Difficult to answer)
- Aid for poor people (relief packages), sick people (equipment for hospitals) IN YOUR OPINION, HAS THIS FOREIGN AID BEEN SUITABLE IN GENERAL AND SPECIFICALLY IN THE FOLLOWING SPHERES?
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Great Britain)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(France)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Germany)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(United States)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Russia)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Canada)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Japan)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Italy)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Scandinavian countries)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(European Union (headquartered in Brussels))
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Others)
- WHO, IN YOUR OPINION, HELPED UKRAINE THE MOST DURING THE YEARS OF INDEPENDENCE (Select no more than three answers)?...(Difficult to say)
- IN YOUR OPINION, DO YOU THINK THAT THE ASSISTANCE RECEIVED BY UKRAINE HAS BEEN GENERALLY BENEFICIAL OR NOT?
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(Too little money was sent)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(What was sent disappeared at the hands of corrupt officials)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(Foreign advisers have been more interested in their own personal gain than in helping Ukraine)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(The rules for obtaining the money have been too complicated)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(Assistance did not get to the most needy people)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(Foreign advisers were poorly prepared to work in Ukraine)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(The wrong kind of assistance was sent, the assistance offered was not adjusted to our needs)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(Other)
- IN YOUR OPINION, IF THE ASSISTANCE HAS NOT BEEN BENEFICIAL, WHY NOT? (Choose no more than three answers)...(Difficult to say)
- HAVE YOU PERSONALLY, OR ANYONE YOU KNOW OF AMONG YOUR FAMILY MEMBERS AND FRIENDS, HAD ANY CONTACT OR EXPERIENCE WITH FOREIGN ASSISTANCE (AID AGENCIES, PROGRAMS, OR PEOPLE)?